get curious, be auroral

Sunday, 16 August 2015

do you want fries with that?

So if you've been on here before, you may be familiar with the 'aurora in art' section of things (if you haven't, you're missing out). 

I listed some of my favourite art works and a song that reminds me of them- last week I spoke about Titian's 'Bacchus and Ariadne' coupled with Aquilo's 'You There' both stunning art worke, man I love them, so today is following on from that, but instead of Bacchus, we got burghers.

Burghers, yeah I haven't spelt it wrong. Not what you get from Macdonalds, but what you get from the Met (lol it's not in the Met that was just for stylistic emphatic effect; the copy I saw was in France at the Rodin museum)

The Burghers of Calais is a sculpture created by Auguste Rodin in 1884-1889. When I see an article, a web page, a description of somebody talking about art, and their opening line is the bog standard title, artist and date- what I've just given you- I'm turned off instantaneously. Fear not, I am not going to bore you, JUST because it is a sculpture and not a film or a playlist. I promise.

I came across this when at school. I studied History of Art at A Level, and was introduced to this about half way through my first year of sixth form as I was assigned it by teacher to study and come up with a presentation to give to the class. So far so good. I know usually at school, projects have the tendency to be more dull than exciting and I was feeling a bit Lana summertime sadness about the whole thing. But Rodin never disappoints.

I googled the sculpture first of all, as anyone would, to see what it looks like. Dark bronze, there was something inherently sad about it all, but the frozen movement of the figures swayed more towards a living thing than a drab-dross take it or leave it. I was intrigued.

In 1347, there was a battle,The Battle of Crecy, which formed part of the 100 years war (effort). Phillip VI of France who ruled Calais was having a slight problem, as Britain's Edward III was holding him and his city under siege. No food, no water forced Philip into an embarassing 'ok you win'. However this was far from over. Ed then decided to give him a hard time, bc y not, and said that he would only lift the siege if 6 significant leaders came forward to be executed. So if Edward III was Kim Jong Un and Philip was David Cameron, the 6 would most likely be George Osbourne, Michael Gove, Harry Styles, Louis Payne, Niall Horan and Louis Tomlinson (haha)

However all was not lost. Phillippa of Hainult, Edward's wife, was preggers, and said to him that it would be a bad omen for their unborn child (I'm guessing she fancied one of the burghers and hoped to elope away from her bitchy husband)- so they didn't die. BUT what Rodin captures is not the moment after of heroic triumph- it's the precedent to it of their heroic bravery, dealing with the prospect of imminent death.

What do you think you would do if I told you that in the next 10 minutes you were going to die? Not sure? Yeah, neither. I have no idea what I would do, how I would feel or who I would tell, talk to; would I even do anything? What Rodin pumps through the whole of this piece is exactly that, the human dubiousness, the unpredictability of human reaction, and having to deal with the worst in the here and now. Deep. 

But how does he do this? Well, we can see the varying emotional responses of the men. Eustache de Saint Pierre was the oldest and the first to volunteer. He is stoic, brave, but also there's something about his face that he's clearly thinking 'holy shit'. And that is what is so great about this, that I think as a 21st century viewer we are really attracted, the psychological thought processes under something that could just appear pretty one dimensional, yet it's dimension other that is where the interest and satisfaction lies.

Unlike Eustache, Andreiu de Wiessant was one of the younger burghers- crouched down, quite similar to Munch's 'The Scream' he wails, he is distraught, and he is crapping himself (not literally). It's really quite powerful, and reminds me of the blood curdling, thank fully few, moments in your life when you hear other people in pain- the screams and the wails that are from so deep within- like the time my Dad had an appendicitis and he was lying on the staircase, screaming in pain- Rodin draws massive pathos for the guy, and makes the sculpture itself very emotional, especially contrasting with the strength of Eustache and Jean D'Aire (who holds the keys to the city). 

Their hands are feet are bigger compared to the rest of their bodies scale wise, so that it looks in proportion from below, yet is also testament to having to deal with the prospect of imminent death, as if death has a physical effect on you, it becomes part of you before it totally becomes you.

I know that it kinda seems like this whole sculpture is about death, imminent death, not dying but almost dying etc etc, but it's just so much more than that. It's about human individualism- Rodin wasn't glorifying these men, which is what the commissioners wanted him to do and so ditched the sculpture when he presented it to them. Rodin exploits their humanistic side, and says yeah these men went through possibly the worst mental experience one will ever have to go through, and this is what it looks like, so how does that make you feel viewer? It's like if someone made a sculpture of David Cameron during his election campaign- tired, persistent and valiant, but still tired- I think Dave would rather a sculpture of him after this year's election- victorious and smug. 

Rodin challenges, he defies, and that's what's so cool about this sculpture and why I love it so much. I hope you like it too, and the song I chose with it is Keaton Henson's 'Sweetheart heart what have you done to us?' 

So I hope that when you next here the word 'burgers', you'll think a little bit further along the thought train than macdonalds. 








PALO ALTO

I know, I'm so behind on this one, I've really caught the Palo Alto plane a little late (2 years actually). Nevertheless, this film is just so so good because it's so so sincere. We love honesty!

There's something so raw (that sounds really cliched I know but you have to watch it and you'll see there's really no other adjective) about it- Gia Coppola captures the essence of the american teenage angst, lust, confusion and direction-lacking temperaments of a bunch of everymans, of 'normals'- rather than beautiful tanned and size 0 abercrombie models complaining about their boyfriends and trapped in a champagne cage of existence. Yawn.

Palo Alto is fresh, even the name is exciting, even though it's the name of where the film is set, who doesn't love Spanish in a film title. The movie follows the lives of April, Teddy and Fred- plus all of their friends who are intermingled in one way or another. April is played by Emma Roberts, and is nice, kind, but revered as the class virgin. She likes Teddy. Teddy, played by Jack Kilmer, is chilled, laid back but at the beginning of the film gets put on community service in a children's library for DUI. He likes April (of course they don't tell each other this). Fred is loud, boisterous and disliked by many- he's a trouble maker, drinks, smokes and sleeps with girls because he can, with no concern for their feelings. He's a doer, not a thinker like Teddy and April. 

It sounds pretty simple, but it's a very sensitively made film- every nuance, subtlety and suggestion is what makes it so great and so watchable; it really defies any preconception of an american film about teenagers. Oh and the soundtrack is AMAzing and will be featured heavily on the September playlist, for sure.

'Everyone pretends to be normal and be your best friend, but underneath, everyone is living some other life you don't know about, and if only we had a camera on us at all times, we could go and watch each other's tapes and find out what each of us was really like' 


disregard wenches, acquire currency

Some/many/all/idk of you would have just had to go through the ordeal that is results day. So did I. Luckily, I managed to get through the gates of hell with 3A*'s and an A, so I am pretty chuffed with that (and breathe).

As was to be expected, thursday night, the night of the unveiling, was not to be like any average to poor thursday night- it was to be glorious. 

And yes, it was indeed 'glorious', I had a good time: I drank, I danced, I drank some more, and shook off the blood, sweat and tears of the past A Level year. 

So the point of this post is not to give you a blow by blow account of how many drinks I had, what I wore, or how 'omg m3ntal' the night was- but is actually a tribute to 3 of my favourite parday tunes at the moment, which I hope will come of use to you this summer. 


My advice, always play loudly- playing dance music quietly is a heinous sin and should never be encouraged. 















Tuesday, 11 August 2015

WAW= weekly art wisdom

'Art and architecture- all the arts- do not have to exist in isolation, as they do now... all the arts, all parts of society, have to be rejoined, and joined more than they have ever been' Donald Judd

Sculpture on Stage

The theatre: a hub of creative performance; the results and consequences of great minds thinking alike, thinking together, and producing brilliance that astounds and inspires again and again.
But would you go to see a show who's main cast consisted entirely of performing sculptures? I'm not kidding.

We love to be entertained, which is why we still love going to see productions, even one's that we've seen before. Part of this draw to the stalls, are the electrifying performances of the actors- they convince you wholeheartedly that they are exactly who they are on the stage- a widowed child, a grieving mother, a secretive daughter. But what happens when you swap human with sculpture? Does the performance become any less gripping? Any less convincing? I read a review of Elmgreen and Dragset's piece Drama Queens, which starred in it's very own theatrical production for Skulpture Projekte Munster- testament to the fact that theatre is truly diversifying.

I picked up a copy of the arts and culture magazine 'Aesthetica'- I'd never read it before or actually really heard of it- my Dad was taking his sweet time reading the FT in the Wh Smith newspaper aisle, and so I had a gander around the arts section and found it behind 'Knitting Weekly' and 'English Gardens' - I highly recommend this for anyone interested in the modern art world, new exhibitions, and innovation coming in from diverse angles by upcoming and established artists from all over the world- a really interesting and worthwhile read. So anyway, back to performing sculptures.

Michael Elmgreen and Ingar Dragset are forward thinkers; they don't settle for the norm, they don't float with the status quo. They subvert the viewer's expectation of what art is, but not in a dry & distant way- it is engaging, inclusive & most importantly, amusing. The piece 'Drama Queens' consists of some of the most iconic pieces of sculpture in the 20th century- Warhol's 'Brillo Boxes', Hepworth's 'Elegy III' and Giacometti's 'Walking Man' to name but a few. Collectively, they represent different areas of modern art and also synecdoche's of their creators- the dialogue they exchange between one another is based largely on this. 

The 'characters' are slightly larger than life size and are motorised, being radio controlled from the wings with actors providing their voices. Tim Etchells, an art installer, comments: 

'There's a great sense of fun in the piece but at heart it's pretty sad too. Maybe there's always something melancholic about objects that start to talk'

I found this comment melancholic in itself actually- talking objects are cool, but yes, I guess kinda sad too, as if they'll never know what it is 'to feel'.

So if this has sparked an interest for you in 'Drama Queens', Elmgreen & Dragset or anything I have mentioned- go and find out more! Do a google search or something- or buy 'Aesthetica', you won't regret it.


Me when I take my driving test